HECHOS: Ante la Corte Suprema se interpone recursos contra el Acuerdo y Sentencia N\u00ba
\n66 de fecha 9 de julio de 2019, por la cual, se resolvi\u00f3: DESESTIMAR el recurso de nulidad
\ninterpuesto por el Abg. Ra\u00fal Netto Villagra, representante legal de la firma Ycu\u00e1 Bola\u00f1os ;
\nIndustrial y Comercial Sociedad An\u00f3nima y convencional de los Sres. Juan Pio Paiva
\nEscobar y Mar\u00eda Victoria C\u00e1ceres de Paiva. REVOCAR la S.D. N\u00b0 546 de fecha 04 de
\nsetiembre del a\u00f1o 2014 y su aclaratoria el A.I. N\u00b0 1200 de fecha 25 de setiembre de 2014,
\n\u00fanicamente en relaci\u00f3n con la firma Ycu\u00e1 Bola\u00f1os; Industrial y Comercial Sociedad
\nAn\u00f3nima y los Sres. Juan Pio Paiva Escobar y Mar\u00eda Victoria C\u00e1ceres de Paiva, y en
\nconsecuencia. RECHAZAR la demanda promovida por los Sres. Felipe de Jes\u00fas Palacios
\nGim\u00e9nez y Mar\u00eda Estela Mor\u00ednigo Gim\u00e9nez de Palacios contra Ycu\u00e1 Bola\u00f1os ; Industrial y
\nComercial Sociedad An\u00f3nima, Juan P\u00edo Helvidio Paiva Escobar y Mar\u00eda Victoria C\u00e1ceres de
\nPaiva. La Excelent\u00edsima Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala Civil y Comercial, RESUELVE:\u2026
\nREVOCAR parcialmente los apartados segundo y tercero del Acuerdo y Sentencia N\u00famero
\n66, de fecha 9 de Julio del 2.019, dictado por el Tribunal de Apelaci\u00f3n en lo Civil y
\nComercial, Cuarta Sala, de la Capital; y, en consecuencia, HACER LUGAR parcialmente a
\nla demanda de indemnizaci\u00f3n de da\u00f1os y perjuicios promovida por Felipe Dejes\u00fas Palacios
\nGim\u00e9nez y Mar\u00eda Estela Mor\u00ednigo Gim\u00e9nez de Palacios contra Juan P\u00edo Paiva Escobar e
\nYcu\u00e1 Bola\u00f1os V Industrial y Comercial Sociedad An\u00f3nima. CONDENAR a Juan P\u00edo Helvidio
\nPaiva Escobar e Ycu\u00e1 Bola\u00f1os V Industrial y Comercial Sociedad An\u00f3nima a pagar a Felipe
\nDejes\u00fas Palacios Gim\u00e9nez la suma de Guaran\u00edes Dos Mil Doscientos Cincuenta Millones (G
\n2.250.000.000), m\u00e1s intereses. CONDENAR a Juan P\u00edo Helvidio Paiva Escobar e Ycu\u00e1
\nBola\u00f1os V Industrial y Comercial Sociedad An\u00f3nima a pagar a Mar\u00eda Estela Mor\u00ednigo
\nGim\u00e9nez de Palacios la suma de Guaran\u00edes Dos Mil Doscientos Cincuenta Millones (G
\n2.250.000.000), m\u00e1s intereses.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
HECHOS: Ante la Corte Suprema se interpone recursos contra el Acuerdo y Sentencia N\u00ba 66 de fecha 9 de julio de 2019, por la cual, se resolvi\u00f3: DESESTIMAR el recurso de nulidad interpuesto por el Abg. Ra\u00fal Netto Villagra, representante legal de la firma Ycu\u00e1 Bola\u00f1os ; Industrial y Comercial Sociedad An\u00f3nima y convencional de […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":5323,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"set","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[181],"tags":[152],"class_list":["post-5320","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-jurisprudencia-destacada","tag-lexinoticias"],"yoast_head":"\n